A high-end device-forensics solution from Cellebrite enables access to vast troves of data on iPhones, including sensitive areas like the Keychain, and can unlock devices even when a passcode is set. The capabilities vary by iPhone model and iOS version, and recent user documentation suggests that the flagship Cellebrite Premium kit can perform tasks that were previously handled by older internal tools. The reach of Cellebrite’s customer base extends well beyond conventional law enforcement, encompassing a wide array of government agencies and private sector players. The combination of hardware, software, and on-device processing enables extensive data extraction, sometimes without the device being unlocked in advance, while other scenarios require passcodes or prior access. The company emphasizes that full-file-system access yields more data than standard logical extractions, including sensitive data from app ecosystems, messaging, location histories, and even data that users might assume remains hidden or deleted. The practical implications of these capabilities touch on privacy, security, and oversight, given the broad spectrum of potential clients and the sensitive nature of the data that can be retrieved.
Overview of Cellebrite’s offerings and client base
Cellebrite has developed a broad portfolio of hardware and software kits designed to unlock smartphones and extract a wide range of data from devices running iOS and Android. These tools are marketed to support forensic investigations, internal corporate inquiries, and cybersecurity assessments. The company’s flagship product line, Cellebrite Premium, is positioned as a comprehensive solution that combines specialized hardware with software capable of accessing the complete contents of a device’s storage, not merely the data visible through standard interfaces. The packaging typically includes a dedicated premium laptop with pre-installed software, specialized adapters for Android and iOS devices, an iOS AFU adapter designed for use after a phone has been powered off, a complete set of cables, a carrying bag, and a hardware license dongle that is required for operation. The emphasis is on enabling investigators to perform full-file-system and physical extractions, which can reveal a depth of data far beyond what is possible with conventional logical extractions.
The user documentation indicates that Cellebrite’s offerings are not limited to strictly public-safety agencies. While Cellebrite Premium is described in theory as being restricted to law enforcement, the reality of who purchases and uses these tools is more nuanced. The company has disclosed having thousands of government customers in the United States, a mix that includes agencies that might not traditionally be associated with law enforcement activities. The list of government entities that reportedly rely on Cellebrite technology spans a broad range of departments and agencies, illustrating how data-access capabilities can intersect with a variety of public programs and regulatory contexts. Examples in the documentation include agencies and offices across environmental protection, agriculture, education, veterans affairs, housing and urban development, and even health and social security-related agencies. The presence of agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others underscores how data-extraction capabilities may intersect with compliance, enforcement, and internal oversight roles that rely on digital forensics. This breadth of potential users signals a shift toward more pervasive use of advanced data-access tools across multiple government functions, raising important questions about governance, privacy protections, and appropriate oversight.
Outside of government use, Cellebrite also lists corporate and cybersecurity customers. Blue-chip companies frequently engage in internal investigations and security assessments, and cybersecurity firms may employ Cellebrite technology to support incident response, forensic analysis, and data recovery tasks. The combination of commercial demand and public-sector deployment highlights how the same technology can serve both private-sector risk management and public-interest investigations. The resulting ecosystem underscores a broader trend in which advanced data-access capabilities are becoming more widely available beyond traditional crime-fighting contexts, prompting ongoing debates about data ownership, civil liberties, and the boundaries of lawful access to personal information.
Cellebrite Premium kit: components and extraction capabilities
The flagship kit from Cellebrite that governs many of the company’s high-end capabilities is the Cellebrite Premium system. This integrated hardware-software package is designed to facilitate comprehensive data extraction from mobile devices, including iPhones, even in conditions where the device is protected by a passcode. The core components of the kit are deliberately designed to work together to maximize the amount of data that can be retrieved. The package typically includes:
- A Cellebrite Premium laptop that hosts the software suite.
- An Android adapter to interface with Android devices.
- An iOS adapter to interface with iPhones.
- An iOS AFU adapter intended for use after the phone has been powered off.
- A complete set of cables for various connectivity needs.
- A carrying bag for portability.
- A hardware license dongle that is required to run the software.
The software bundled with the kit enables two broad modes of data extraction: targeted data extraction and full filesystem extraction. In targeted extraction, investigators can retrieve specific categories of data such as Messages or photos. In full filesystem extraction, the software retrieves a nearly complete snapshot of user data from the device, including sensitive data that resides in protected storage areas. One of the most significant capabilities highlighted in the documentation is access to the iOS Keychain and other highly protected areas, which can enable access to passwords and, by extension, many services users commonly rely on. In effect, full-file-system extraction allows a more complete view of user activity and history than a standard, app-centric data pull.
Cellebrite describes the benefits of full-file-system and physical extractions as yielding substantially more data than logical extractions. The enhanced data retrieval includes access to data stored within the Secure Enclave, the Keychain, and other protected storage areas that are typically beyond reach with standard forensic methods. The documentation emphasizes that accessing third-party app data, stored passwords and tokens, chat conversations, location histories, email attachments, system logs, and even content that has been deleted can significantly increase the chances of uncovering incriminating or evidence-valuable information. The breadth of data accessible through these methods makes the kit a powerful tool for investigations but also intensifies concerns about privacy and potential misuse, given the depth of information that can be extracted from a single device.
A key element of the kit’s on-device data access is the ability to retrieve data regardless of the iPhone’s current state, including scenarios where the device is locked. The documentation notes that full filesystem access can be achieved on various iPhone models and iOS versions, with unlocking time dependent on the complexity of the passcode. Importantly, the kit’s reach is not limited to a single iOS version; rather, it is described as capable of working across multiple iOS versions, including older and newer releases, though the exact capabilities can vary by model and version. The AFU adapter and related tools are designed to support unlocking procedures even after the device has been powered off, which underscores the kit’s emphasis on flexible handling in operational environments where devices may be captured in various states.
In practice, the combination of hardware and software is designed to enable investigators to perform a range of extractions, up to and including full filesystem access, which can encompass sensitive elements like Keychains, app data, chat logs, and other artifacts that are central to a thorough forensic analysis. The resulting data footprint can be substantial, and the ability to access deleted content adds another layer of depth to the investigation. The overall takeaway is that Cellebrite Premium is marketed as a comprehensive, end-to-end solution for extracting extensive data from iPhones, often in ways that bypass standard protections, subject to the device’s hardware and software constraints and the legal framework governing its use.
iPhone model and iOS version compatibility: unlocking capabilities by device
A critical aspect of Cellebrite Premium’s advertised capabilities is its reach across iPhone models and iOS versions. The documentation outlines a nuanced landscape of which devices can be fully accessed and under what conditions. The key distinctions revolve around whether the device is unlocked, whether it is protected by a passcode, and which iOS version it runs. Broadly, there are three major categories that define the kit’s accessibility across devices:
- Full access even when the device is locked, across any supported iOS version
In this category, Cellebrite Premium claims the ability to unlock and gain full filesystem access to certain models regardless of the iOS version in use. The models explicitly named include:
- iPhone 4S
- iPhone 5
- iPhone 5S
- iPhone 6
- iPhone 6S
- iPhone SE
- iPhone 7
- iPhone 8
- iPhone X
For these models, the documentation indicates that unlocking is possible without regard to the iOS version, though the unlocking time will vary with the passcode’s complexity. There is an important distinction within this category: for iPhone models that were released earlier, namely iPhone 4S through iPhone 5S and some successors, in-house unlocking methods were historically required when the device was running iOS versions such as iOS 5 or iOS 6. The documentation notes that for certain early models, direct unlocking using Cellebrite Premium is viable for iOS 7 and later, whereas earlier iOS versions demanded a separate in-house unlocking step. The reason these particular models can be cracked across iOS versions is attributed to unpatchable vulnerabilities that were present in the hardware or firmware. Examples cited include the checkm8 exploit and a vulnerability discovered in the Secure Enclave later in the same year, both of which were described as unpatchable, enabling persistent access across updates.
- Full access even when locked, with older iOS versions (up to iOS 13.7)
There is a subset of models for which full access while locked is possible when they run iOS versions up to and including 13.7. The models specified in this category are:
- iPhone XR
- iPhone Xs
- iPhone 11
In these cases, Cellebrite Premium can unlock and access the full filesystem even if the device is locked, provided the device is operating on iOS versions up to 13.7. The documentation implies that the combination of hardware capabilities and the software toolkit can exploit exploitable conditions or undocumented pathways that allow access to the device’s storage without requiring an entered passcode for that operating system range.
- Full access only with a passcode for newer iOS versions (iOS 14/15)
A different scenario arises for certain models running newer iOS versions (iOS 14 or iOS 15). In these cases, full filesystem access is possible only if the device has a known passcode. The three models listed under this constraint are:
- iPhone XR (iOS 14 or 15)
- iPhone XS (iOS 14 or 15)
- iPhone 11 (iOS 14 or 15)
If the passcode is known, Cellebrite Premium can deliver full filesystem access even on these newer iOS versions. However, in the absence of the passcode, the kit cannot unlock these devices to reveal the entire filesystem. The emphasis here is on a shift in capability contingent on the device’s security posture: newer iOS versions are designed to harden access mechanisms, making unauthenticated unlocking unattainable under the documented configurations, while the availability of the passcode removes that barrier.
The documentation also underscores that the above categories reflect capabilities that pre-date certain iPhone releases, noting that the material predates the launch of the iPhone 13. As such, the landscape of supported devices and the exact efficacy of unlocking can change with new hardware and software updates. The overall narrative is that Cellebrite Premium’s ability to access full data on iPhones is not universal across all models and iOS versions; rather, it follows a structured pattern in which older devices and specific iOS windows are more susceptible to full access, while newer devices may require a known passcode to achieve the same depth of data extraction.
-
Observations on law enforcement authority and practical considerations
The intersection of these unlocking capabilities with legal authority remains a jurisdiction-dependent matter. In some contexts, law enforcement may be empowered or compelled to assist suspects in revealing passcodes, while in other jurisdictions, the legal framework may constrain the use of such tools. The documentation alludes to the fact that whether law enforcement can compel a suspect to disclose a passcode depends on the country and applicable jurisdiction. This nuance reflects the broader tension between public safety interests and individual privacy rights, especially when powerful forensic tools can bypass or circumvent device protections. -
Brute-force unlocking: time considerations and safeguards
A crucial operational detail highlighted in the documentation is the reliance on brute-force methods to break passcodes. The process requires the kit to attempt numerous passcode guesses, exploiting ways to disable Apple’s built-in lockout mechanism that activates after repeated failed attempts. Despite this, the process remains slow due to deliberate delays that are introduced to prevent rapid, automated attempts from running unchecked. The documentation cites an example rate of roughly 100 attempts per day, illustrating how brute-force unlocking can be a protracted endeavor. In practice, these timeframes can influence case processing, resource planning, and overall investigation timelines.
An added dimension is the kit’s ability to incorporate personal data supplied by the user to inform initial attempts. Investigators can enter personal information about the phone’s owner—such as dates like birthdates or significant anniversaries or birthdays associated with important people in the owner’s life—to seed initial guesses. This feature underscores how even seemingly innocuous personal data can be leveraged to optimize brute-force strategies, raising concerns about the protection of such data and how it should be safeguarded within a powerful investigative tool.
- Autonomous mode: on-device processing and parallelization
Cellebrite Premium introduces an autonomous mode that changes how brute-force attempts are conducted. Historically, the brute-force attack required the phone to remain connected to the kit during the operation. In the autonomous mode, the attack runs on the device itself, with the target iPhone carrying out the dictionary-based attack, while the kit can be disconnected. This capability allows the attack to proceed on multiple devices in parallel without tethering each device to the hardware for the entire duration of the process. The result is a more scalable approach to device unlocking, enabling investigators to sequence and dispatch devices to carry out brute-force attempts concurrently. It is important to emphasize that even with autonomous mode, physical access to the phone is still a prerequisite for initiating the attack. The autonomous capacity is about on-device execution, not remote deployment, which remains a key differentiator from other spyware solutions that operate without direct device access.
In summary, the premium kit’s unlocking capabilities are aligned with a mix of on-device processing, on-site hardware support, and a deep integration between the hardware and software stack. The toolset is designed to maximize data access across a broad range of devices and iOS versions, with the understanding that some devices and versions are more susceptible to full access than others. The presence of unpatchable vulnerabilities in older models and specific iOS versions provides a technical pathway for full access in those scenarios, while newer devices may require additional information such as a known passcode to achieve the same level of data retrieval. These capabilities illustrate both the power of modern mobile forensics and the complexity of defending user data in the face of sophisticated extraction tools.
Practical implications: data depth, privacy, and oversight considerations
The depth of data accessible through Cellebrite Premium—ranging from system-level artifacts to user-generated content—has broad implications for privacy, civil liberties, and oversight. The ability to retrieve Keychain data, which can unlock a multitude of services, means that a single device could reveal access credentials to a variety of accounts and apps, potentially exposing a broad spectrum of private information if misused or improperly authorized. The inclusion of deleted content and historical data further compounds privacy concerns, as it allows investigators to reconstruct timelines that users may assume are no longer recoverable. The capability to extract third-party app data and tokens raises questions about how app ecosystems and their authentication mechanisms are treated in forensic contexts, and it underscores the need for rigorous controls, chain-of-custody procedures, and clear policy frameworks governing when and how such data can be collected, stored, and analyzed.
From an oversight perspective, the broad client base—covering multiple government departments and private sector entities—indicates that access controls and governance models must be robust. The documentation’s clarification that the precise policy governing who can purchase or use Cellebrite Premium remains unclear suggests a need for transparent, standardized procurement and accountability processes. In jurisdictions where civil liberties protections are strong, there may be statutory or procedural requirements that govern the use of forensic tools, including warrants, consent, and limitations on data collection. The reality that devices across a spectrum of agencies can be accessed by a single kit underlines how crucial it is to maintain strict internal controls around device acquisition, data handling, and audit trails to prevent misuse or unwarranted data exfiltration.
The existence of autonomous on-device brute-force operations also raises practical considerations for device security and user privacy. The idea that a device could be subjected to dictionary attacks while disconnected from a forensic workstation highlights the risk that some devices may be vulnerable to unauthorized attempts if they fall into the wrong hands. This underscores the imperative for developers, device manufacturers, and policymakers to invest in defensive measures—such as stronger passcode policies, improved rate-limiting or authentication strategies, and user education about protecting personal data. It also emphasizes the need for clear lines of responsibility and redress mechanisms if forensics tools are used inappropriately, whether in civil, corporate, or governmental contexts.
It’s worth noting that the documentation and capabilities described appear to pre-date newer iPhone releases. The stated limitations—for example, certain models being unlocked only if a passcode is known on iOS 14/15—reflect a rapid evolution in mobile security and the countermeasures implemented by Apple over time. As devices incorporate more advanced hardware, cryptographic protections, and secure enclaves, the practical reach of on-device forensic tools may shift. This dynamic landscape reinforces the importance of ongoing monitoring of hardware/software changes, regular updates to forensic toolkits, and continuous assessment of how these tools align with current legal standards and ethical norms.
Model-specific unlocking: technical nuances and strategic considerations
To better understand the practical deployment of Cellebrite Premium, it helps to highlight the model-specific nuances and strategic implications of the listed capabilities. The early iPhone models, such as the iPhone 4S through iPhone 8 and the iPhone X, are described as having vulnerabilities that permit full access even when locked, independent of the iOS version. This is notable not only for investigators seeking comprehensive data, but also for defenders who aim to safeguard information on devices used in sensitive contexts. The presence of unpatchable vulnerabilities in these models—like checkm8 and subsequent Secure Enclave flaws—serves as a reminder that hardware-based weaknesses can provide a backdoor into data stores that were previously considered secure. The fact that in-house unlocking was sometimes required for certain iOS versions in older models reflects the specialized nature of the toolkit and the need for bespoke approaches in forensic workflows.
For newer models and iOS versions, the documentation indicates that full access without a passcode is not guaranteed. The iPhone XR, iPhone XS, and iPhone 11, when running iOS versions up to 13.7, are said to permit full access even when locked, but once iOS 14 or iOS 15 is in play for these same models, full access requires the passcode. This shift underscores how modern security enhancements—such as new authentication flows and protective measures in iOS 14 and later—raise the bar for forensic access unless the passcode is known. The ability to unlock older devices irrespective of iOS version illustrates the long tail of legacy hardware in forensics, where models in circulation for years can still yield valuable data under certain conditions. In real-world terms, this means that investigators may prioritize certain devices and timelines based on model and OS correlations to maximize the likelihood of successful data extraction within the constraints of a given case.
The broader takeaway is that Cellebrite Premium’s effectiveness is highly contextual. It depends on device generation, the iOS version, the presence or absence of a passcode, and the practical realities of how quickly passcode attempts can be executed. The technology’s strength lies in its ability to adapt to a diverse set of devices and configurations, offering investigators a spectrum of options for data retrieval. The trade-offs involve legal and ethical considerations, the potential for data to be exposed to unintended parties if misused, and the continuous evolution of mobile device protections that can alter what is feasible in any given scenario.
Ethical, legal, and governance considerations in high-end device forensics
The breadth of access provided by high-end forensic tools like Cellebrite Premium prompts a thoughtful examination of ethical and legal boundaries. The ethical use of such tools hinges on strict adherence to legal authority, clear case approvals, and robust oversight mechanisms. Given that the kit can retrieve deeply sensitive information, including Keychain data, private communications, and deleted content, governance frameworks must address questions about necessity, proportionality, and the minimum data required to achieve legitimate investigative objectives. Oversight should include audit trails, access controls, and transparent reporting about which devices were examined, what data was retrieved, and how it was stored, analyzed, and shared.
Legal frameworks vary by jurisdiction, but common threads include the requirement for warrants or orders for intrusive searches, the need to protect personal data beyond the scope of the investigation, and safeguards against overreach or mission creep. The documentation’s note that law enforcement may or may not have the power to compel a suspect to reveal a passcode—dependent on country and jurisdiction—highlights the role that legal standards play in determining what is feasible in practice. In jurisdictions with strong privacy protections, agencies must weigh the benefits of data access against the potential harm to individual rights, ensuring that data collection remains proportionate to the investigation’s aims and subject to judicial review where appropriate.
Beyond the law, there are broader societal considerations about the normalization of pervasive data access tools. The ability to unlock devices and retrieve highly sensitive data across a broad swath of government agencies and corporate entities raises concerns about scope creep, the potential for misuse, and the need for credible accountability mechanisms. Stakeholders include civil liberties organizations, data protection authorities, manufacturers, and the general public, all of whom may be affected by the use and misuse of such technologies. Transparent policy development, responsible disclosure practices around vulnerabilities, and ongoing dialogue about privacy-preserving alternatives are essential components of governance in this space.
It is important to note that the documentation reviewed by researchers reflects a particular snapshot in time—pre-dating iPhone 13’s release—and technological capabilities may evolve as new devices and operating systems emerge. This reality reinforces the need for continuous monitoring of security posture, declassification of relevant information where appropriate, and a collaborative approach among manufacturers, investigators, and policymakers to establish norms for the responsible use of high-end forensic tools. By foregrounding ethical and legal considerations, stakeholders can better navigate the balance between legitimate investigative needs and the protection of individual privacy in an increasingly data-rich landscape.
Conclusion
Cellebrite’s Premium kit represents a powerful set of capabilities in the realm of mobile forensics, offering hardware and software integration that enables extensive data access on iPhones. The kit’s ability to unlock devices and perform full-file-system extractions—often including protected data such as Keychains and app data—highlights the depth of access available to trained investigators under appropriate legal authority. The breadth of potential customers, spanning both government agencies and private sector organizations, underscores the widespread reliance on advanced data-access tools across multiple domains, while also emphasizing the need for principled governance, privacy protections, and oversight to prevent misuse.
The model- and OS-version-dependent landscape of unlocking capabilities illustrates how device security evolves over time and how forensic tools must adapt accordingly. While older devices and certain iOS versions offer more permissive pathways to full data access, newer devices and versions increasingly require a known passcode or exhibit restricted access, underscoring the dynamic tension between device security and forensic reach. Brute-force unlocking remains a time-consuming process, and the introduction of autonomous on-device attacks adds a layer of efficiency—though always within the constraint of requiring physical access to the device.
Safeguards, clear policies, and robust governance are essential to ensure that powerful forensics capabilities are employed responsibly, with due regard for privacy rights and legal mandates. As technology evolves, ongoing scrutiny of how such tools are used, who has access to them, and under what circumstances will be crucial in maintaining public trust while enabling legitimate investigative work.
